Mini Nutritional Assessment MNA Short and Full form Calculator

MNA short form:
A) Does the patient have a loss of appetite? Has he eaten less in the past 3 months due to lack of appetite, digestive problems, and difficulty chewing or swallowing?
B) Recent weight loss (<3 months)
C) Motricity
D) Acute illness or psychological stress in the past 3 months?
E) Neuropsychological problems
F) Body Mass Index (BMI)
End of the short MNA, the Result at the end of the form

Full MNA score only (overall assessment):
G) Does the patient live independently at home?
H) Take more than 3 medications per day?
I) Bedsores or skin wounds?
J) How many actual meals does the patient eat per day?
K) Does he consume?
Dairy products at least once a day?
Once or twice a week eggs or legumes?
Daily meat, fish, or poultry?
L) Does he eat fruit or vegetables at least twice a day?
M) How many drinks does he consume per day (water, juice, coffee, tea, milk...)?
N) Manner of eating
O) Le patient se considère-t-il bien nourri ?
P) Does the patient feel healthier or worse than most people his age?
Q) Brachial Circumference
R) Calf Circumference


Short MNA (screening): :

Full MNA :

Total MNA:

Nutritional status:

Maintaining adequate nutritional status is crucial for overall health and well-being, particularly among vulnerable populations such as older adults. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is a widely recognized and validated tool used to assess nutritional status in various healthcare settings. The MNA consists of both a short form and a full form, providing valuable insights into an individual's nutritional status and risk of malnutrition. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Mini Nutritional Assessment, including its purpose, components, scoring system, and clinical applications. Understanding the MNA and its utility in nutritional assessment is essential for healthcare professionals in identifying individuals at risk of malnutrition and implementing appropriate interventions to improve their nutritional status and overall health.

Purpose of the MNA

The MNA aims to accomplish several specific goals:

  1. Identification of malnutrition risk: The MNA helps healthcare professionals identify individuals who are at risk of malnutrition or undernutrition. By assessing various components of nutritional status, such as dietary intake and weight loss, the MNA provides a comprehensive evaluation of an individual's nutritional health.

  2. Early intervention: Early identification of malnutrition risk allows healthcare professionals to intervene promptly and implement appropriate interventions to address nutritional deficiencies. This may include dietary modifications, nutritional supplementation, or referral to a registered dietitian for further assessment and guidance.

  3. Monitoring nutritional changes: The MNA can be used to track changes in nutritional status over time. By periodically reassessing individuals, healthcare professionals can evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and make adjustments to the nutrition care plan as needed.

  4. Support for decision-making: The MNA provides healthcare professionals with a standardized and systematic tool for evaluating nutritional status. It aids in decision-making regarding the need for further assessment, referral to specialized care, or initiation of appropriate interventions.

  5. Research and population-level assessment: The MNA is widely used in research studies and population-level assessments to gather data on nutritional status. It allows for comparisons across different populations and facilitates the understanding of factors influencing nutritional health in specific groups.

Overall, the primary purpose of the MNA is to assess nutritional status, identify individuals at risk of malnutrition, and guide appropriate interventions to optimize nutritional health and well-being. Its comprehensive evaluation provides valuable insights into an individual's nutritional needs and helps healthcare professionals tailor nutrition care plans to meet those needs.

Components and Scoring of the MNA

The MNA consists of multiple components that assess various aspects of nutritional status. Both the MNA short form and the MNA full form evaluate similar domains, but the full form provides more comprehensive information. The components typically include:

  1. Anthropometric measurements: The individual's weight, height, and BMI are measured to assess body composition and detect changes in weight that may indicate nutritional concerns.

  2. Dietary assessment: The individual's dietary intake is evaluated using a combination of self-reported food intake and interviewer-based assessment. This component assesses the adequacy of nutrient intake and identifies dietary deficiencies.

  3. Global assessment: The individual's subjective perception of their nutritional status and self-reported weight loss are evaluated. This component considers the individual's perception of their own nutritional status and provides insights into their overall well-being.

  4. Functional assessment: The individual's mobility, ability to perform daily activities, and presence of physical limitations are assessed. This component examines the impact of physical function on nutritional status.

  5. Psychological assessment: The individual's psychological well-being, cognitive function, and mood are evaluated. This component considers the psychological factors that may influence nutritional status and eating habits.

The MNA scoring system varies depending on whether the short form or the full form is used:

  • MNA Short Form: The short form consists of six questions and is designed for rapid screening purposes. It provides an overall score ranging from 0 to 14 points, with higher scores indicating better nutritional status. A score of 12-14 indicates normal nutritional status, 8-11 indicates at risk of malnutrition, and below 8 indicates malnutrition.

  • MNA Full Form: The full form includes additional questions and assessments, providing a more comprehensive evaluation of nutritional status. The full form provides an overall score ranging from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating better nutritional status. A score of 24-30 indicates normal nutritional status, 17-23.5 indicates at risk of malnutrition, and below 17 indicates malnutrition.

Clinical Applications of the MNA

The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) has several clinical applications in the assessment and management of nutritional status, particularly among older adults:

  1. Screening tool: The MNA is widely used as a screening tool to identify individuals at risk of malnutrition or undernutrition. It helps healthcare professionals quickly assess an individual's nutritional status and determine the need for further evaluation and intervention.

  2. Nutritional assessment: The MNA provides a comprehensive evaluation of an individual's nutritional status by assessing multiple domains, including anthropometric measurements, dietary intake, global assessment, functional assessment, and psychological assessment. This information assists healthcare professionals in understanding the individual's nutritional needs and tailoring interventions accordingly.

  3. Intervention planning: Based on the MNA score and component assessments, healthcare professionals can develop personalized nutrition care plans to address identified nutritional deficiencies. These plans may include dietary modifications, oral nutritional supplements, education on healthy eating habits, and referrals to registered dietitians or nutritionists for more specialized guidance.

  4. Monitoring nutritional changes: The MNA can be used to track changes in nutritional status over time. By periodically reassessing individuals, healthcare professionals can monitor the effectiveness of interventions and make necessary adjustments to the nutrition care plan.

  5. Disease management: The MNA helps healthcare professionals identify individuals with chronic conditions or undergoing medical treatments who are at increased risk of malnutrition. It aids in the management of these individuals by providing insights into their nutritional needs and enabling the implementation of appropriate interventions to support their overall health and recovery.

  6. Research and population-level assessment: The MNA is widely used in research studies and population-level assessments to gather data on nutritional status. It allows for comparisons across different populations and settings, facilitating the identification of trends, risk factors, and interventions related to malnutrition.

  7. Education and awareness: The MNA serves as an educational tool for healthcare professionals, caregivers, and individuals themselves. It increases awareness about the importance of nutritional status, highlights the signs of malnutrition, and emphasizes the role of nutrition in overall health and well-being.

Limitations of the MNA

While the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is a widely used and valuable tool for assessing nutritional status, it has certain limitations that should be considered:

  1. Subjectivity: The MNA relies on self-reported information and subjective assessments, such as the individual's perception of their nutritional status and subjective weight loss. This subjectivity can introduce biases and limitations in the accuracy of the results.

  2. Cultural and language bias: The MNA was originally developed and validated in Western populations, and the specific questions and cutoffs may not be applicable or appropriate for all cultural and ethnic groups. Cultural differences in dietary habits, body composition, and health perceptions may influence the interpretation of the MNA results.

  3. Limited assessment of specific populations: The MNA was primarily developed and validated for use in older adults, particularly those living in community or long-term care settings. Its applicability and validity in other populations, such as children, pregnant women, or individuals with specific medical conditions, may be limited.

  4. Lack of sensitivity for mild nutritional deficits: The MNA may not be sensitive enough to detect mild nutritional deficits or subtle changes in nutritional status. It is more effective in identifying moderate to severe malnutrition or undernutrition.

  5. Incomplete assessment of dietary intake: The MNA relies on self-reported dietary intake, which may be subject to recall bias or underestimation of actual food consumption. It may not capture the full complexity of an individual's dietary habits and nutrient intake.

  6. Inability to capture changes in body composition: The MNA primarily focuses on weight and BMI as indicators of body composition. It may not fully capture changes in muscle mass, body fat distribution, or fluid status, which are important factors in nutritional assessment.

  7. Lack of consideration for social and environmental factors: The MNA primarily evaluates individual-level factors and may not adequately consider social and environmental factors that influence nutritional status, such as access to food, socioeconomic status, or social support.

Despite these limitations, the MNA remains a valuable tool for nutritional assessment in many clinical settings. However, healthcare professionals should interpret the results in conjunction with other clinical information, consider individual factors, and use their clinical judgment to make appropriate recommendations for nutritional management and care.

In conclusion, the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is a valuable tool for assessing nutritional status, particularly in the elderly population. It provides a comprehensive evaluation of an individual's nutritional health by considering multiple domains, allowing healthcare professionals to identify individuals at risk of malnutrition and implement appropriate interventions. While the MNA has limitations, such as subjectivity and cultural bias, it remains a widely recognized and validated tool in nutritional assessment. The MNA's use in screening, intervention planning, monitoring, and research supports the promotion of optimal nutritional health and improved overall well-being. As research continues to refine and improve the MNA, its utility in identifying and addressing malnutrition risk will continue to evolve, ultimately enhancing the nutritional care and quality of life for individuals in need.